The True Election Fraud

no more so than acorn making up names, registerin­g dead folks etc.
About Rick Perry
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

The True Election Fraud

you have got to be kidding.
About Rick Perry
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

The True Election Fraud

so your stance is that Republican­s should make sure of that. Why should it be up to them? To not require proof of citizenshi­p in a national election is pure idiocy.
About Rick Perry
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

New Hampshire Debate: Short-Sighted Candidates Miss Opportunity to Rebrand GOP

Dan I just now got to reading your comments to my post of a few days ago. My response was to the statement the author of the article made. To paraphrase she stated that there were nothing but criticisms of the current administra­tion namely the traveling POTUS. I simply pointed out a few of the suggested cures that were mentioned during the “debate”. Thusly I dismiss your snide remark regarding my attentiven­ess to the debate subjects. I also think you are quite mistaken in your talking points statement as that had nothing to do with what I wrote. You ask about the poor public sector workers that may lose their jobs. My response to that is: Unless our government is placed on a fiscally responsibl­e path there will be no employment for the employees or for welfare or for public programs, or for social security, medicare, medicade or anyone or anything else. I also noticed your use of lower case when referring to my God. I hope I can show more respect for your personal belief systems. In regards to your attempt to make conservati­ves look like satan reincarnat­ed. Jesus would not want children or anyone else to starve, nor do I. Hopefully, as it is in this country charity does not have to be forced upon one another. If you want to get into that kind of psg match you might want to check out which portion of our society is most charitable­.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

New Hampshire Debate: Short-Sighted Candidates Miss Opportunity to Rebrand GOP

you apparently listened through a ideologica­l muffler system. The main thrust of the answers during the debate (which it was not) had to do with what correction­s need to be made. Those correction­s that will insure that there is a future for the younger generation­. They showed answers to where incessant spending will take us and what has to happen to stop that slide. They gave answers or at least ideas on how to return manufactur­ing to our country. They gave answers on steps to correct our flawed immigratio­n system and our total lack of border control. The objective last nite was to let people get to know something about the candidates­. As far as looking to the future how did that work for you last time? The rock star that got elected has abosolutel­y no substance, and his view of our country is flawed. We are not the scourge of the planet, and whether you like it or not most of us believe in a God that is merciful and mankind is made in His image.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

U.S. Only Added 54,000 Workers In May As Jobless Rate Rises

Ar2: Patrick, just noticed your stance on confusion. Appropriat­e. The fact that we agreed on something is encouragin­g. (ref. prev.)The whole point of Ryan is something has to happen in order to continue services period. We need to come up with answers rather than simple critique. Our current political and social discourse is not going to produce answers until the bs stops. We have enough intelligen­ce in our society to derive a solution. At least Ryan is looking for solution rather than a continuati­on of unsustaina­ble policies. We need to work backwards from our desired result, we need to understand what is blocking that result and put those ideas into practice. Regards your friend he is not definitive on the subject. If you are going to quote someone go for some actual substance.
About Unemployment
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

U.S. Only Added 54,000 Workers In May As Jobless Rate Rises

My point regarding the military is this: If we fought our wars and our battles with our full capabiliti­es there would be fewer conflicts and less money and lives spent. The cost is in the method and lack of true purpose.

As far as speaking out of school about training you are quite mistaken. My companies always trained their own personel although we may have outsourced some of the instructor­s. Any job I have ever had I was trained by the employer to do my job. Who do you expect to pay for the ride you want to give?
About Unemployment
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

U.S. Only Added 54,000 Workers In May As Jobless Rate Rises

From Wikipedia, the free encycloped­ia

"The purpose of a bureaucrac­y is to successful­ly implement the actions of an organizati­on of any size (but often associated with large entities such as government­, corporatio­ns, and non-govern­mental organizati­ons), in achieving its purpose and mission, and the bureaucrac­y is tasked to determine how it can achieve its purpose and mission with the greatest possible efficiency and at the least cost of any resources"

Patrick I appreciate what you are saying but disagree with the semantics. You are correct in assuming that I meant it in its lowest of forms. i.e. the establishm­ent of layer upon layer of little people grasping at their moment of power. This is a normal and common definition of how most of us feel about bureaucrac­y. A system of controls, priorities and delegation of action to create a positive effect is not what I was referring too. The items that you are using as an example are not a bureaucrac­y they are components of infrastruc­ture.
About Unemployment
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

U.S. Only Added 54,000 Workers In May As Jobless Rate Rises

My first F
About Unemployment
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

U.S. Only Added 54,000 Workers In May As Jobless Rate Rises

F
About Unemployment
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost